Author Archives: Jason Hughey

About Jason Hughey

Stop Hating the Rich

Ok. Pet peeve.

I’m tired of hearing people talk about how the rich game the system and take all of our money. Certainly, corporate welfare and cronyism play a part of the present injustices in society. It’s evil and it has to stop.

But this general hatred of the rich and of their wealth absolutely has to go. I keep hearing people complain that the rich have gamed the system and taken everything from us. They are out to get the middle class, to turn us into their personal serfs, they exploit labor, etc., etc., etc. We’re told that it’s not fair that they are rich and we are not. Our president literally banks his political rhetoric off of the assumption that most Americans accept this attitude.

If you’re one of these people, stop it. Just stop it.

Chances are, if you were to take one random day from a rich person’s life (Steve Jobs, Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Truett Cathy, Charles Koch, David Koch, Warren Buffett, etc.) I would bet that in that day, they provided more value for the rest of society than either your life or my life in total. Their various political viewpoints aside, in their day to day lives, these people have taken risks, launched new ventures, failed many times, tested many ideas, and figured out newer and better ways of serving you and me.  For that, millions of individuals have voluntarily given them lots of money.

Instead of thinking about how greedy and evil rich people are, instead of being angry that they have more money than others, instead of worrying about income inequality, instead of complaining that the system is rigged against us, ask yourself just one question:

“What value have I created today in service of others?”

Let’s stop ripping at the speck in the eye of the rich and start realizing the log of envy that is rammed fast into our own eye.  It’s a really humbling thought to realize that the reason that you’re not wealthy yet is not because you’re young, old, unlucky, tired, perpetually busy, or a victim of circumstances.

It’s because you’re just not as good as the rich at giving the world a lot of value.

This isn’t an insult.  It’s just a fact.  The only person that can change this reality is you.  The Internet has transformed many of the old ways that people used to run businesses and make money.  It’s given us all a platform from which to think and to explore new ideas.  It’s provided us with the ability to each figure out how we can contribute to a dynamic and changing world.  At the same time, that means that none of us have an excuse for an inability to provide value to the world.

I ask again:

“What value have I created today in service of others?”

If more people started asking themselves this question whenever they heard someone complaining about corporate greed, wealthy elites, and the 1%…

…then maybe, just maybe, the world might change a little bit for the better.


Internet Piracy: A Sure Bet

I just read a fascinating article at the New York Times on the inevitability of internet piracy by Nick Bilton.  Granted, it’s a few months old, but I couldn’t help but be amazed by the candidness of Bilton in reporting the simple fact that internet piracy is absolutely here to stay.

I couldn’t help but be encouraged.

On the issue of intellectual property in the domain of the Internet, the free market is winning against crony capitalism and government authoritarianism.  Individuals everywhere are receiving the benefit.  The losers are, of course, the production companies and the MPAA, who would love to remain forever rich based on the monopolistic privileges granted to them under copyright law.

Quite frankly, defenders of intellectual property have absolutely no response to this alleged “crisis” of the lack of intellectual property enforcement.  It is not going anywhere.   If you want to stop it at this point, you would probably have to ban the Internet.  Instead of continuing to come up with failed enforcement mechanisms, it will be exciting to see a day when the state finally retreats from its defense of special interests and recognizes that the pirates have won a complete and total victory.

Furthermore, as Bilton points out, this piracy will very soon be carried over into the 3D printing world when 3D printers will become as much a part of every home as laptop computers, televisions, and iPads.  Millions of individuals will have the ability to simply download a file for a design they want to create, probably through some sort of bitTorrent program, and then print out whatever the heck they want within the comfort of their own home.

Statists and sophists will decry such “piracy” as an evil and a scourge upon society.

Those of us who understand how free markets actually work will know better.  It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realize that 3D-printing used in this fashion will make millions of people better off.  Simply put, through the power of piracy and the ability to copy designs, individuals will be able to provide things for themselves in their own homes that today we must go to a store to buy.   Think of all the business potential!  The innovation!  The spontaneous order!

The market is beautiful because it is peaceful, dynamic, competitive, and orderly all in one.  Copyright turns actors in the free market into mortal enemies, constantly looking out for those who would seek to steal their super special idea that they presume no one has heard of before.  As Isaac Moorehouse put it, it’s one of the most childish things I’ve ever heard of.

Sorry, this link is broken!  But PSY still made lots of money by ignoring copyright violations!  :)

PSY made millions on “Gangnam Style” by ignoring copyright violations.

The great thing is that the market is already realizing that this is the wave of the future…and adjusting to it.  For example, PSY literally ignored violations of the copyright on his song, “Gangnam Style.”  As a result, he made $8.1 million dollars and his video is now the most viewed video on YouTube with over 1 billion views.  Jeffrey Tucker details this fascinating reality in his article, “How the State Will Die.”

Meanwhile, Robert Neuwirth details the significance of the informal economy (known as System D)–which mainly consists of street vendors, small shops, and actors who are not subject to formal state regulation.  This is probably the closest thing to free market capitalism that we have in the world today…and it is rampant with this concept of “piracy.”   But this System D informal market works and it’s humming along beautifully.  It’s a blossoming flower of spontaneous order.  Even more than that, Neuwirth reveals that American businesses actually want to see their products pirated in System D so that they know they’re doing something right.

Everywhere, the market is already winning due to piracy.  Government regulation would try to stifle and prevent this, and in some cases it has, but the long run looks good for piracy, and consequently, for the free market.

This is what detractors of intellectual property have been saying for a long time.  Intellectual property law is a stale artifact of government intervention.  It stifles innovation and serves the special interests of crony capitalism.  But, by it’s very nature, it is incapable of keeping up with the forces of the free market.

The good news is that, unless you want to ban the Internet and 3-D printing…

…the pirates will always win.

Your move, IP advocates.

Let’s reflect on the lessons here. In our time, the state’s regulatory apparatus, not just in intellectual property, but in every area of life, has set up an untenable situation for nearly everyone. Even those who imagined that they would benefit from it are not doing so to the extent they believed. That is because the march of history does not stop in the face of even the largest attempts at enforcement. The market will prevail — which is just another way of saying that human action will prevail over the coercive machinery of the government — in the long run. – Jeffrey Tucker, “How the State Will Die”

A Quick Survey on Abortion

I am very curious about something.  I’ve been thinking about a couple of conversations that I’ve had with individuals over the course of the past year with regard to the issue of abortion.  I am curious to see patterns of thought with regard to this issue.  I have some suspicions, but I want to broach the question to a broader audience (the readers on this blog).

Also, an important caveat: assume that the mother’s life is not threatened by carrying the pregnancy to term.  I should have clarified this in question #2, but I did not.

I realize that this is completely unscientific and non-representative.  I also realize I can’t confirm if each individual votes in all three polls.  That’s fine.  I just want to get a general idea regarding how people perceive the abortion issue from a moral and political perspective.